The book suggests TIEs have a life-support system, which is opposite of what we have read for years. Now, despite of the fact that Rogue One basically defined how big a TIE Fighter is, this book went with a larger size, never referenced anywhere else. First, they list new sizes for all the main TIEs. Their book on the TIE Fighter has some really wacky information. One of these books is the IncrediBuilds series, which is part technical journal and part wooden model builder. Moreover, they often list contradictory information, so it's difficult to determine how accurate they are. You could still consider these books canon, but they aren't at the top. However, occasionally there are recent books or games or whatever that disagree with the main sources. And, their sizes usually line up with all other recent releases. They usually have input from Pablo Hidalgo and other people who fact-check everything. Now, I usually consider the Star Wars Databank and the more recent Visual Guides/Cross-Sections as the best OFFICIAL canon sources. I use the smaller size for non-CW versions. Minor change listed in the Rogue One Visual Guide. Minor change listed in the Rogue One Visual Guide and confirmed in the Starfighter Manual. Then, the Rogue One Visual Guide took it to 7.24 m, very close to my estimates.ģ.5 m is hull length, 6.96 is wing length. Upped to 8.99 m, maybe for Fantasy Flight game. There's no way a the Clone Wars refit upped it to 138.55 m. The original Consular-class Radiant VII is still 115 m. I use 19.34 m for wingspan, which fits the canon height and length. Rebels version is most likely the 21 meter reference. The Phantom II would have to be smaller to fit on the Ghost.Ĭhanged with Blue YT-1300 Owner's Manual. The Blue YT-1300 Owner's Manual lists Lando's as 40.8 meters with escape pod. Minor change, fits Bandai 1/12 scale kit perfectly. I use the smaller size for scales.Ĭhanged to match appearance in The Clone Wars. Larger size refers to version seen in Rebels. Old ILM reports and 2008 Databank showed 900 km. Old ILM reports and 2008 Databank showed 160 km. Mandalorian version is different still at 381 m. It reflects my analysis from prior years.Ĭlone Wars and Rebels versions are different. See the Rogue One Visual Guide.Īll sizes use length, unless otherwise noted. Rogue One brought several more changes to the official sizes, since the ILM digitally recreated all of the ships to scale with their pilots. Whether or not it's accurate is another matter. As always, my Scale Lists have the "reference" size that I am using. Yet, these are still good starting points in case you see discrepancies in reported sizes. Many references in the Incredible Cross-Sections books exclude the cannons from the overall length (such as the AT-TE). However, I rarely know when a reported size includes the cannons. Also, I have tried to give you guys an idea of what might have spurred these changes. Now, most of the changes are minimal, yet some are almost double. Several vehicles saw their sizes altered to fit either the new canon or the actual size of the models. It seems that the entire Star Wars Databank changed around the time Disney bought Lucasfilm.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |